Or maybe Sarah is a fiendishly clever mad scientist who is about to commit a crime and then genetically engineer her own DNA. That way, the sample they have "on file" will rule her out as the culprit.
Will try again... in response to Sabine's comment, maybe Sarah is a fiendishly clever mad scientist who is plotting to commit some crime and then genetically engineer her own DNA. That way, the DNA sample "on file" will clear her as the culprit.
Ohhhh! This is going to be good!
ReplyDeleteOoooh! (Genuinely also my first reaction.) I'm looking forward to this.
ReplyDeleteNow Sarah can never rob a bank because she has voluntarily given up her DNA. Think things through, Sarah!!
ReplyDeleteWay to spoil the ending, Sabine!
DeleteOr maybe Sarah is a fiendishly clever mad scientist who is about to commit a crime and then genetically engineer her own DNA. That way, the sample they have "on file" will rule her out as the culprit.
ReplyDeleteOk, this is weird, I posted a comment and it was showing up, but it's not here anymore. Any idea of what happened to it? Did Sarah kidnap it?
ReplyDeleteWill try again... in response to Sabine's comment, maybe Sarah is a fiendishly clever mad scientist who is plotting to commit some crime and then genetically engineer her own DNA. That way, the DNA sample "on file" will clear her as the culprit.
ReplyDeleteWay to ruin the ending, Helen
ReplyDeleteIt concerns me that these potential endings may be better than the story itself. Maybe we need to do some of the pass-it-around writing at some point!
ReplyDelete